Baulkham Hills vs Mount Gambier suburb comparison (NSW vs SA)

Baulkham Hills for retirees and families; Mount Gambier for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Baulkham HillsMount Gambier

Overall score

Baulkham Hills

69.5/100

Mount Gambier

69.1/100

Crime rate

Baulkham Hills

22.1 / 1k

Mount Gambier

58.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Baulkham Hills

285

Mount Gambier

554

Population

Baulkham Hills

37,415

Mount Gambier

25,591

Metric leadBaulkham Hills 6Mount Gambier 4across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBaulkham HillsMount Gambier
Overall score69.5/10069.1/100
Housing (desirability)42.3/10055.7/100
Crime rate22.1 / 1k58.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools1220
Parks & reserves24
Public transport stops460121
Walkability84.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities285554
Planning activity66201
Population37,41525,591
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/101/10

Comparison summary

Across states, Baulkham Hills is a hillside larger suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace, whereas Mount Gambier is a leafier hillside larger suburb with elevated outlooks. Baulkham Hills sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Mount Gambier is further into the wider countryside.

Baulkham Hills tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and public transport access, while Mount Gambier stands out for housing affordability and schools and education options. Baulkham Hills generally means more sought-after housing, while Mount Gambier leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Choose Baulkham Hills if you are weighing retirees and families; lean toward Mount Gambier for investors and value-focused buyers.

Related comparisons