Overall score
Baulkham Hills
69.5/100
Mount Gambier
69.1/100
Baulkham Hills for retirees and families; Mount Gambier for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Baulkham Hills
69.5/100
Mount Gambier
69.1/100
Crime rate
Baulkham Hills
22.1 / 1k
Mount Gambier
58.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Baulkham Hills
285
Mount Gambier
554
Population
Baulkham Hills
37,415
Mount Gambier
25,591
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Baulkham Hills | Mount Gambier |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 69.5/100 | 69.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 42.3/100 | 55.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 22.1 / 1k | 58.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 12 | 20 |
| Parks & reserves | 24 | — |
| Public transport stops | 460 | 121 |
| Walkability | 84.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 285 | 554 |
| Planning activity | 66 | 201 |
| Population | 37,415 | 25,591 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 1/10 |
Across states, Baulkham Hills is a hillside larger suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace, whereas Mount Gambier is a leafier hillside larger suburb with elevated outlooks. Baulkham Hills sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Mount Gambier is further into the wider countryside.
Baulkham Hills tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and public transport access, while Mount Gambier stands out for housing affordability and schools and education options. Baulkham Hills generally means more sought-after housing, while Mount Gambier leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Choose Baulkham Hills if you are weighing retirees and families; lean toward Mount Gambier for investors and value-focused buyers.