Beacon Hill vs Cromer, NSW suburb comparison

Beacon Hill for families and investment; Cromer for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Beacon HillCromer

Overall score

Beacon Hill

62.7/100

Cromer

59.3/100

Crime rate

Beacon Hill

46.9 / 1k

Cromer

26.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Beacon Hill

243

Cromer

718

Population

Beacon Hill

7,814

Cromer

8,030

Metric leadBeacon Hill 3Cromer 71 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBeacon HillCromer
Overall score62.7/10059.3/100
Housing (desirability)37.2/10037.7/100
Crime rate46.9 / 1k26.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools94
Parks & reserves1121
Public transport stops76109
Walkability34.0/10036.0/100
Nearby amenities243718
Planning activity1518
Population7,8148,030
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Beacon Hill reads as an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Cromer is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Beacon Hill pulls ahead on overall desirability and a calmer planning outlook, whereas Cromer is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

On balance, investors and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Beacon Hill, while Cromer remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons