Beaconsfield vs O'Connor, WA Suburb Comparison

Beaconsfield for retirees and value; O'Connor for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BeaconsfieldO'Connor

Overall score

Beaconsfield

57.5/100

O'Connor

57.8/100

Crime rate

Beaconsfield

56.9 / 1k

O'Connor

56.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Beaconsfield

309

O'Connor

169

Population

Beaconsfield

5,315

O'Connor

460

Metric leadBeaconsfield 8O'Connor 12 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBeaconsfieldO'Connor
Overall score57.5/10057.8/100
Housing (desirability)49.7/10048.4/100
Crime rate56.9 / 1k56.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools119
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves6
Public transport stops3323
Walkability96.0/10063.0/100
Nearby amenities309169
Green cover10.0%0.8%
Population5,315460
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/107/10

Comparison summary

Beaconsfield reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; O'Connor is a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby.

Beaconsfield pulls ahead on housing affordability, schools and education options, and public transport access, whereas O'Connor is the better pick for a hub for schools and preschools, plus highly regarded local schools.

Choose Beaconsfield if you are weighing retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers; lean toward O'Connor for households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons