Bedford vs Embleton, WA Suburb Comparison

Bedford for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BedfordEmbleton

Overall score

Bedford

56.0/100

Embleton

47.6/100

Crime rate

Bedford

47.4 / 1k

Embleton

47.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bedford

147

Embleton

82

Population

Bedford

5,716

Embleton

3,600

Metric leadBedford 8Embleton 13 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBedfordEmbleton
Overall score56.0/10047.6/100
Housing (desirability)55.8/10051.2/100
Crime rate47.4 / 1k47.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools99
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves95
Public transport stops3542
Walkability86.0/10034.0/100
Nearby amenities14782
Green cover8.4%7.9%
Population5,7163,600
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/106/10

Comparison summary

Bedford reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Embleton is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Bedford tends to lead on housing affordability, parks and reserves, and walkability, while Embleton stands out for public transport access.

Retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers may find Bedford the better fit, while households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Embleton.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons