Belconnen vs Cook, ACT Suburb Comparison

Belconnen for retirees; Cook for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BelconnenCook

Overall score

Belconnen

61.8/100

Cook

64.5/100

Crime rate

Belconnen

83.8 / 1k

Cook

11.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Belconnen

1,307

Cook

150

Population

Belconnen

8,502

Cook

2,965

Metric leadBelconnen 5Cook 61 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBelconnenCook
Overall score61.8/10064.5/100
Housing (desirability)53.9/10078.7/100
Crime rate83.8 / 1k11.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools45
Weather (desirability)51.2/10051.2/100
Parks & reserves91
Walkability100.0/10057.5/100
Nearby amenities1,307150
Planning activity54
Green cover25.7%4.1%
Population8,5022,965
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/1010/10

Comparison summary

Belconnen reads as an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Cook is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Belconnen tends to lead on parks and reserves, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities, while Cook stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Cook, while Belconnen remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons