Overall score
Belconnen
61.8/100
Gosnells
43.9/100
Belconnen vs Gosnells Suburb Comparison (ACT vs WA)
Belconnen for retirees and families; Gosnells for investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
BelconnenGosnells
Crime rate
Belconnen
83.8 / 1k
Gosnells
60.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Belconnen
1,307
Gosnells
791
Population
Belconnen
8,502
Gosnells
21,149
Metric leadBelconnen 7Gosnells 4across 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Belconnen | Gosnells |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 61.8/100 | 43.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 53.9/100 | 50.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 83.8 / 1k | 60.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 7 |
| Weather (desirability) | 51.2/100 | 23.4/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 9 | 40 |
| Public transport stops | — | 143 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 70.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 1,307 | 791 |
| Planning activity | 5 | — |
| Green cover | 25.7% | 10.3% |
| Population | 8,502 | 21,149 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 1/10 |
Comparison summary
Across states, Belconnen is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, whereas Gosnells is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby. Belconnen sits closer to the city centre, whereas Gosnells is in a middle-ring position.
Belconnen tends to lead on walkability, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability, while Gosnells stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options.
Choose Belconnen if you are weighing retirees, families, investors, and households prioritising schools; lean toward Gosnells for value-focused buyers.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.