Overall score
Bell Post Hill
38.3/100
Lovely Banks
35.5/100
Bell Post Hill for retirees and families; Lovely Banks for value and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Bell Post Hill
38.3/100
Lovely Banks
35.5/100
Crime rate
Bell Post Hill
61.4 / 1k
Lovely Banks
71.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Bell Post Hill
77
Lovely Banks
2
Population
Bell Post Hill
5,083
Lovely Banks
2,782
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Bell Post Hill | Lovely Banks |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 38.3/100 | 35.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 75.1/100 | 53.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 61.4 / 1k | 71.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 20 | 5 |
| Walkability | 34.0/100 | 7.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 77 | 2 |
| Planning activity | 28 | 14 |
| Green cover | 7.6% | 0.3% |
| Population | 5,083 | 2,782 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 3/10 | 4/10 |
Bell Post Hill is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Lovely Banks is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks. Lovely Banks sits among greener hillside streets, while Bell Post Hill keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Bell Post Hill pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and parks and reserves, whereas Lovely Banks is the better pick for housing affordability, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage. On housing, Bell Post Hill sits in a affordable band, compared with a gently premium feel in Lovely Banks.
Families, investors, and households prioritising schools may find Bell Post Hill the better fit, while retirees are more likely to prefer Lovely Banks.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.