Overall score
Belmont
49.0/100
Marks Point
27.2/100
Belmont for beach lifestyle and investment; Marks Point for families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Belmont
49.0/100
Marks Point
27.2/100
Crime rate
Belmont
87.9 / 1k
Marks Point
88.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Belmont
73
Marks Point
24
Population
Belmont
7,289
Marks Point
1,861
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Belmont | Marks Point |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 49.0/100 | 27.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 63.1/100 | 33.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 87.9 / 1k | 88.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 6 | 3 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 121 | 14 |
| Walkability | 73.0/100 | 21.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 73 | 24 |
| Planning activity | 34 | 8 |
| Population | 7,289 | 1,861 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 2/10 |
Put side by side, Belmont is a coastal mid-sized suburb shaped by beach life and outdoor living, and Marks Point is a settled metro smaller community that keeps everyday living grounded and accessible. Belmont leans into coastal living, while Marks Point feels more inland and suburban in character.
On the data, Belmont is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Marks Point answers with a calmer planning outlook. Belmont generally means more sought-after housing, while Marks Point leans toward more approachable housing costs.
On balance, families and people chasing a beach lifestyle are more likely to prefer Belmont, while Marks Point remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.