Coal Point vs Marks Point, NSW Suburb Comparison

Coal Point for retirees and families; Marks Point for investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Coal PointMarks Point

Overall score

Coal Point

46.4/100

Marks Point

32.8/100

Crime rate

Coal Point

80.9 / 1k

Marks Point

88.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Coal Point

18

Marks Point

24

Population

Coal Point

1,749

Marks Point

1,861

Metric leadCoal Point 6Marks Point 52 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCoal PointMarks Point
Overall score46.4/10032.8/100
Housing (desirability)44.9/10056.8/100
Crime rate80.9 / 1k88.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools13
Weather (desirability)60.5/10060.5/100
Parks & reserves11
Public transport stops4214
Walkability30.0/10021.0/100
Nearby amenities1824
Planning activity2712
Green cover20.6%0.1%
Population1,7491,861
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/102/10

Comparison summary

Coal Point is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm, while Marks Point is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm.

On the data, Coal Point is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and public transport access; Marks Point answers with schools and education options, nearby cafés and amenities, and a calmer planning outlook.

On balance, retirees and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Coal Point, while Marks Point remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons