Overall score
Coal Point
46.4/100
Marks Point
32.8/100
Coal Point for retirees and families; Marks Point for investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Coal Point
46.4/100
Marks Point
32.8/100
Crime rate
Coal Point
80.9 / 1k
Marks Point
88.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Coal Point
18
Marks Point
24
Population
Coal Point
1,749
Marks Point
1,861
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Coal Point | Marks Point |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 46.4/100 | 32.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 44.9/100 | 56.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 80.9 / 1k | 88.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 3 |
| Weather (desirability) | 60.5/100 | 60.5/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 42 | 14 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 21.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 18 | 24 |
| Planning activity | 27 | 12 |
| Green cover | 20.6% | 0.1% |
| Population | 1,749 | 1,861 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 2/10 |
Coal Point is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm, while Marks Point is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm.
On the data, Coal Point is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and public transport access; Marks Point answers with schools and education options, nearby cafés and amenities, and a calmer planning outlook.
On balance, retirees and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Coal Point, while Marks Point remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.