Overall score
Coal Point
46.4/100
Fishing Point
38.6/100
Coal Point for retirees and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Coal Point
46.4/100
Fishing Point
38.6/100
Crime rate
Coal Point
80.9 / 1k
Fishing Point
80.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Coal Point
18
Fishing Point
11
Population
Coal Point
1,749
Fishing Point
1,105
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Coal Point | Fishing Point |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 46.4/100 | 38.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 44.9/100 | 45.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 80.9 / 1k | 80.9 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 3 |
| Weather (desirability) | 60.5/100 | 60.5/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 42 | 22 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 18 | 11 |
| Planning activity | 27 | 9 |
| Green cover | 20.6% | 5.1% |
| Population | 1,749 | 1,105 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 8/10 |
Put side by side, Coal Point is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm, and Fishing Point is a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand.
On the data, Coal Point is stronger for public transport access, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability; Fishing Point answers with housing affordability, schools and education options, and a calmer planning outlook.
On balance, families and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Fishing Point, while Coal Point remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.