Overall score
Arcadia Vale
36.4/100
Coal Point
36.0/100
Arcadia Vale for families and investment; Coal Point for retirees and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Arcadia Vale
36.4/100
Coal Point
36.0/100
Crime rate
Arcadia Vale
81.1 / 1k
Coal Point
80.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Arcadia Vale
26
Coal Point
17
Population
Arcadia Vale
1,431
Coal Point
1,749
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Arcadia Vale | Coal Point |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 36.4/100 | 36.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 50.4/100 | 44.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 81.1 / 1k | 80.9 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 31 | 42 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 26 | 17 |
| Planning activity | 9 | 23 |
| Population | 1,431 | 1,749 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 10/10 |
Arcadia Vale reads as a practical metro smaller community with solid links to the wider city; Coal Point is a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel.
Arcadia Vale pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Coal Point is the better pick for public transport access and overall desirability.
Arcadia Vale suits investors more clearly, whereas Coal Point is the stronger match for retirees and households prioritising schools.