Buttaba vs Coal Point, NSW Suburb Comparison

Buttaba for value; Coal Point for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ButtabaCoal Point

Overall score

Buttaba

35.7/100

Coal Point

46.4/100

Crime rate

Buttaba

80.8 / 1k

Coal Point

80.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Buttaba

5

Coal Point

18

Population

Buttaba

1,204

Coal Point

1,749

Metric leadButtaba 4Coal Point 71 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryButtabaCoal Point
Overall score35.7/10046.4/100
Housing (desirability)46.2/10044.9/100
Crime rate80.8 / 1k80.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools21
Weather (desirability)60.5/10060.5/100
Parks & reserves—1
Public transport stops1942
Walkability28.5/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities518
Planning activity927
Green cover2.7%20.6%
Population1,2041,749
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Buttaba is a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand, and Coal Point is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm.

Buttaba tends to lead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options, while Coal Point stands out for public transport access, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities.

Investors and value-focused buyers may find Buttaba the better fit, while retirees, families, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Coal Point.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons