Fishing Point vs Rathmines, NSW Suburb Comparison

Rathmines for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Fishing PointRathmines

Overall score

Fishing Point

38.6/100

Rathmines

48.9/100

Crime rate

Fishing Point

80.9 / 1k

Rathmines

80.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Fishing Point

11

Rathmines

35

Population

Fishing Point

1,105

Rathmines

2,076

Metric leadFishing Point 2Rathmines 74 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryFishing PointRathmines
Overall score38.6/10048.9/100
Housing (desirability)45.4/10064.8/100
Crime rate80.9 / 1k80.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools33
Weather (desirability)60.5/10060.5/100
Parks & reserves11
Public transport stops2239
Walkability30.0/10063.0/100
Nearby amenities1135
Planning activity913
Green cover5.1%22.0%
Population1,1052,076
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/105/10

Comparison summary

Fishing Point reads as a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand; Rathmines is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm.

Fishing Point pulls ahead on a calmer planning outlook and stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Rathmines is the better pick for housing affordability, public transport access, and walkability.

Fishing Point suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Rathmines is the stronger match for investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons