Awaba vs Rathmines, NSW Suburb Comparison

Awaba for families; Rathmines for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

AwabaRathmines

Overall score

Awaba

35.2/100

Rathmines

48.9/100

Crime rate

Awaba

80.2 / 1k

Rathmines

80.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Awaba

22

Rathmines

35

Population

Awaba

430

Rathmines

2,076

Metric leadAwaba 2Rathmines 92 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAwabaRathmines
Overall score35.2/10048.9/100
Housing (desirability)10.1/10064.8/100
Crime rate80.2 / 1k80.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools13
Weather (desirability)60.5/10060.5/100
Parks & reserves11
Public transport stops1339
Walkability19.5/10063.0/100
Nearby amenities2235
Planning activity313
Green cover18.6%22.0%
Population4302,076
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/105/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Awaba is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm, and Rathmines is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm.

Awaba pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook, whereas Rathmines is the better pick for housing affordability, schools and education options, and public transport access.

On balance, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Rathmines, while Awaba remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons