Awaba vs Rathmines, NSW suburb comparison

Rathmines for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

AwabaRathmines

Overall score

Awaba

25.1/100

Rathmines

45.7/100

Crime rate

Awaba

80.2 / 1k

Rathmines

80.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Awaba

21

Rathmines

34

Population

Awaba

430

Rathmines

2,076

Metric leadAwaba 2Rathmines 81 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAwabaRathmines
Overall score25.1/10045.7/100
Housing (desirability)40.0/10074.0/100
Crime rate80.2 / 1k80.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools13
Parks & reserves11
Public transport stops1339
Walkability19.5/10063.0/100
Nearby amenities2134
Planning activity211
Population4302,076
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/105/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Awaba is a settled metro smaller community that keeps everyday living grounded and accessible, and Rathmines is a settled metro smaller community that balances access with everyday calm.

Awaba pulls ahead on a calmer planning outlook, whereas Rathmines is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. Awaba generally means more approachable housing costs, while Rathmines leans toward more sought-after housing.

On balance, families and investors are more likely to prefer Rathmines, while Awaba remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons