Belmont vs Wandana Heights, VIC suburb comparison

Belmont for investment and value; Wandana Heights for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BelmontWandana Heights

Overall score

Belmont

70.0/100

Wandana Heights

52.5/100

Crime rate

Belmont

99.6 / 1k

Wandana Heights

12.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Belmont

551

Wandana Heights

116

Population

Belmont

15,066

Wandana Heights

2,195

Metric leadBelmont 8Wandana Heights 3across 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBelmontWandana Heights
Overall score70.0/10052.5/100
Housing (desirability)62.1/10050.4/100
Crime rate99.6 / 1k12.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools95
Parks & reserves132
Public transport stops642
Walkability100.0/1003.0/100
Nearby amenities551116
Planning activity17214
Population15,0662,195
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Belmont is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Wandana Heights is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks. Wandana Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Belmont keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Belmont is stronger for housing affordability and schools and education options; Wandana Heights answers with a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook. Belmont generally means more mid-market housing value, while Wandana Heights leans toward more sought-after housing.

Belmont suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Wandana Heights is the stronger match for retirees and families.

Related comparisons