Overall score
Belmont
70.0/100
Wandana Heights
52.5/100
Belmont for investment and value; Wandana Heights for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Belmont
70.0/100
Wandana Heights
52.5/100
Crime rate
Belmont
99.6 / 1k
Wandana Heights
12.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Belmont
551
Wandana Heights
116
Population
Belmont
15,066
Wandana Heights
2,195
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Belmont | Wandana Heights |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 70.0/100 | 52.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 62.1/100 | 50.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 99.6 / 1k | 12.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 9 | 5 |
| Parks & reserves | 13 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 64 | 2 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 3.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 551 | 116 |
| Planning activity | 172 | 14 |
| Population | 15,066 | 2,195 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 10/10 |
Put side by side, Belmont is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Wandana Heights is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks. Wandana Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Belmont keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Belmont is stronger for housing affordability and schools and education options; Wandana Heights answers with a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook. Belmont generally means more mid-market housing value, while Wandana Heights leans toward more sought-after housing.
Belmont suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Wandana Heights is the stronger match for retirees and families.