Overall score
Grovedale
54.9/100
Wandana Heights
51.2/100
Grovedale for retirees and investment; Wandana Heights for families and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Grovedale
54.9/100
Wandana Heights
51.2/100
Crime rate
Grovedale
56.1 / 1k
Wandana Heights
18.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Grovedale
383
Wandana Heights
118
Population
Grovedale
14,869
Wandana Heights
2,195
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Grovedale | Wandana Heights |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 54.9/100 | 51.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 71.6/100 | 55.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 56.1 / 1k | 18.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 7 | 5 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 8 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 86 | 2 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 3.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 383 | 118 |
| Planning activity | 88 | 14 |
| Green cover | 9.6% | 2.9% |
| Population | 14,869 | 2,195 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 10/10 |
Grovedale is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Wandana Heights is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks. Wandana Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Grovedale keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Grovedale is stronger for housing affordability, schools and education options, and parks and reserves; Wandana Heights answers with a quieter safety profile, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage. Grovedale generally means housing toward the upper end of the market, while Wandana Heights leans toward more sought-after housing.
Grovedale suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Wandana Heights is the stronger match for retirees and families.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.