Overall score
Belmont
55.4/100
Thomson
43.0/100
Belmont vs Thomson, VIC Suburb Comparison
Belmont for retirees and investment; Thomson for families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
BelmontThomson
Crime rate
Belmont
99.6 / 1k
Thomson
—
Nearby amenities
Belmont
557
Thomson
92
Population
Belmont
15,066
Thomson
1,606
Metric leadBelmont 8Thomson 22 tiedacross 12 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Belmont | Thomson |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 55.4/100 | 43.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 62.5/100 | 53.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 99.6 / 1k | — |
| Schools & preschools | 9 | 9 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 13 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 64 | 15 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 28.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 557 | 92 |
| Planning activity | 172 | 8 |
| Green cover | 6.7% | 7.2% |
| Population | 15,066 | 1,606 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 2/10 |
Comparison summary
Belmont is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Thomson is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Belmont tends to lead on housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access, while Thomson stands out for a calmer planning outlook. Belmont generally means housing toward the upper end of the market, while Thomson leans toward more approachable housing costs.
On balance, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Belmont, while Thomson remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.