Benalla vs Goorambat, VIC Suburb Comparison

Benalla for retirees and investment; Goorambat for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BenallaGoorambat

Overall score

Benalla

44.6/100

Goorambat

44.3/100

Crime rate

Benalla

132.8 / 1k

Goorambat

147.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Benalla

28

Goorambat

4

Population

Benalla

10,822

Goorambat

269

Metric leadBenalla 8Goorambat 31 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBenallaGoorambat
Overall score44.6/10044.3/100
Housing (desirability)69.9/10051.0/100
Crime rate132.8 / 1k147.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools5—
Weather (desirability)13.4/10013.4/100
Parks & reserves131
Public transport stops542
Walkability30.0/1003.0/100
Nearby amenities284
Planning activity3004
Green cover2.5%2.6%
Population10,822269
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/106/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Benalla is a regional established suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace, and Goorambat is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.

On the data, Benalla is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves; Goorambat answers with a calmer planning outlook and stronger socioeconomic advantage. Benalla generally means more approachable housing costs, while Goorambat leans toward more mid-market housing value.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Benalla, while Goorambat remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons