Overall score
Bendigo
71.4/100
Long Gully
55.8/100
Bendigo for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Bendigo
71.4/100
Long Gully
55.8/100
Crime rate
Bendigo
653.7 / 1k
Long Gully
168.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Bendigo
845
Long Gully
124
Population
Bendigo
5,652
Long Gully
3,420
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Bendigo | Long Gully |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 71.4/100 | 55.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 63.5/100 | 72.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 653.7 / 1k | 168.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 11 | 6 |
| Parks & reserves | 10 | 7 |
| Public transport stops | 82 | 15 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 72.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 845 | 124 |
| Planning activity | 309 | 32 |
| Population | 5,652 | 3,420 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 1/10 |
Bendigo reads as a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience; Long Gully is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace. Long Gully sits among greener hillside streets, while Bendigo keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Bendigo pulls ahead on schools and education options and parks and reserves, whereas Long Gully is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. Bendigo generally means more mid-market housing value, while Long Gully leans toward more approachable housing costs.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Bendigo, while Long Gully remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.