Beverley vs Kidman Park, SA suburb comparison

Beverley for schools; Kidman Park for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BeverleyKidman Park

Overall score

Beverley

38.8/100

Kidman Park

51.5/100

Crime rate

Beverley

72.4 / 1k

Kidman Park

24.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Beverley

151

Kidman Park

115

Population

Beverley

1,578

Kidman Park

3,874

Metric leadBeverley 2Kidman Park 7across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBeverleyKidman Park
Overall score38.8/10051.5/100
Housing (desirability)35.3/10054.1/100
Crime rate72.4 / 1k24.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools3
Public transport stops616
Walkability19.0/10024.0/100
Nearby amenities151115
Planning activity3086
Population1,5783,874
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/107/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Beverley is a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby, and Kidman Park is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

On the data, Beverley is stronger for nearby cafés and amenities and a calmer planning outlook; Kidman Park answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

Choose Beverley if you are weighing households prioritising schools; lean toward Kidman Park for retirees and investors.

Related comparisons