Beverley vs Kidman Park, SA suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Beverley | Kidman Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 33.6/100 | 51.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 35.3/100 | 54.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 82.4 / 1k | 27.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 6 | 16 |
| Walkability | 19.0/100 | 24.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 151 | 115 |
| Planning activity | 28 | 68 |
| Population | 1,578 | 3,874 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 7/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesKidman Park
- Best for familiesKidman Park
- Best for investmentKidman Park
- Best for best valueKidman Park
- Best for best schoolsKidman Park
Comparison summary
Beverley (SA) and Kidman Park offer different strengths across official suburb data. Kidman Park leads on more comparison categories overall. Overall score favours Kidman Park; Housing (desirability) favours Kidman Park; Crime rate favours Kidman Park. Quick verdicts: Retirees → Kidman Park, Families → Kidman Park, Investment → Kidman Park, Best value → Kidman Park.