Overall score
Beverley
38.8/100
Kidman Park
51.5/100
Beverley for schools; Kidman Park for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Beverley
38.8/100
Kidman Park
51.5/100
Crime rate
Beverley
72.4 / 1k
Kidman Park
24.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Beverley
151
Kidman Park
115
Population
Beverley
1,578
Kidman Park
3,874
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Beverley | Kidman Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 38.8/100 | 51.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 35.3/100 | 54.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 72.4 / 1k | 24.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 6 | 16 |
| Walkability | 19.0/100 | 24.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 151 | 115 |
| Planning activity | 30 | 86 |
| Population | 1,578 | 3,874 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 7/10 |
Put side by side, Beverley is a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby, and Kidman Park is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
On the data, Beverley is stronger for nearby cafés and amenities and a calmer planning outlook; Kidman Park answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
Choose Beverley if you are weighing households prioritising schools; lean toward Kidman Park for retirees and investors.