Overall score
Kidman Park
47.9/100
Seaton
55.6/100
Kidman Park vs Seaton, SA suburb comparison
Kidman Park for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Kidman ParkSeaton
Crime rate
Kidman Park
33.3 / 1k
Seaton
64.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Kidman Park
115
Seaton
224
Population
Kidman Park
3,874
Seaton
10,877
Metric leadKidman Park 4Seaton 6across 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesKidman Park
- Best for familiesKidman Park
- Best for investmentKidman Park
- Best for best schoolsKidman Park
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Kidman Park | Seaton |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 47.9/100 | 55.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 54.1/100 | 44.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 33.3 / 1k | 64.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 4 |
| Public transport stops | 16 | 51 |
| Walkability | 24.0/100 | 63.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 115 | 224 |
| Planning activity | 88 | 118 |
| Population | 3,874 | 10,877 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 3/10 |
Comparison summary
Kidman Park reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Seaton is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
On the data, Kidman Park is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Seaton answers with schools and education options and public transport access. Kidman Park generally means more sought-after housing, while Seaton leans toward more approachable housing costs.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Kidman Park, while Seaton remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.