Bexley vs Ramsgate, NSW Suburb Comparison

Bexley for retirees and schools; Ramsgate for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BexleyRamsgate

Overall score

Bexley

52.4/100

Ramsgate

53.3/100

Crime rate

Bexley

26.3 / 1k

Ramsgate

59.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bexley

250

Ramsgate

55

Population

Bexley

19,646

Ramsgate

1,151

Metric leadBexley 7Ramsgate 51 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBexleyRamsgate
Overall score52.4/10053.3/100
Housing (desirability)33.4/10049.4/100
Crime rate26.3 / 1k59.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools229
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves133
Public transport stops24121
Walkability36.0/10034.0/100
Nearby amenities25055
Planning activity254
Green cover4.6%31.0%
Population19,6461,151
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/109/10

Comparison summary

Bexley is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Ramsgate is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by.

On the data, Bexley is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options; Ramsgate answers with a calmer planning outlook and stronger socioeconomic advantage.

Retirees, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools may find Bexley the better fit, while investors are more likely to prefer Ramsgate.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons