Overall score
Blakeview
35.3/100
Munno Para
36.7/100
Blakeview vs Munno Para, SA Suburb Comparison
Blakeview for investment; Munno Para for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
BlakeviewMunno Para
Crime rate
Blakeview
54.3 / 1k
Munno Para
155.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Blakeview
60
Munno Para
183
Population
Blakeview
8,979
Munno Para
4,719
Metric leadBlakeview 4Munno Para 71 tiedacross 12 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesMunno Para
- Best for familiesMunno Para
- Best for investmentBlakeview
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Blakeview | Munno Para |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 35.3/100 | 36.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 59.5/100 | 69.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 54.3 / 1k | 155.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | 6 |
| Weather (desirability) | 37.3/100 | 37.3/100 |
| Public transport stops | 29 | 46 |
| Walkability | 61.0/100 | 79.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 60 | 183 |
| Planning activity | 48 | 192 |
| Green cover | 1.6% | 4.6% |
| Population | 8,979 | 4,719 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 3/10 | 1/10 |
Comparison summary
Blakeview is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Munno Para is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.
Blakeview pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile, a calmer planning outlook, and a larger local community, whereas Munno Para is the better pick for schools and education options, public transport access, and walkability.
Blakeview suits retirees more clearly, whereas Munno Para is the stronger match for investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.