Overall score
Blakiston
32.9/100
Mount Barker
60.9/100
Blakiston for retirees; Mount Barker for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Blakiston
32.9/100
Mount Barker
60.9/100
Crime rate
Blakiston
4.3 / 1k
Mount Barker
29.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Blakiston
0
Mount Barker
250
Population
Blakiston
377
Mount Barker
18,330
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Blakiston | Mount Barker |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 32.9/100 | 60.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 47.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 4.3 / 1k | 29.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 9 |
| Public transport stops | 1 | 64 |
| Walkability | 1.5/100 | 80.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 250 |
| Planning activity | 5 | 453 |
| Population | 377 | 18,330 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 6/10 |
Put side by side, Blakiston is a settled metro smaller community that balances access with everyday calm, and Mount Barker is a leafier hillside established suburb with elevated outlooks. Mount Barker sits among greener hillside streets, while Blakiston keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Blakiston is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Mount Barker answers with public transport access and walkability.
Choose Blakiston if you are weighing retirees; lean toward Mount Barker for families and investors.