Littlehampton vs Mount Barker, SA suburb comparison

Littlehampton for retirees and investment; Mount Barker for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

LittlehamptonMount Barker

Overall score

Littlehampton

53.3/100

Mount Barker

60.9/100

Crime rate

Littlehampton

9.1 / 1k

Mount Barker

29.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Littlehampton

48

Mount Barker

250

Population

Littlehampton

3,300

Mount Barker

18,330

Metric leadLittlehampton 4Mount Barker 6across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryLittlehamptonMount Barker
Overall score53.3/10060.9/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10047.6/100
Crime rate9.1 / 1k29.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools29
Public transport stops1564
Walkability53.5/10080.0/100
Nearby amenities48250
Planning activity68450
Population3,30018,330
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/106/10

Comparison summary

Littlehampton reads as a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby; Mount Barker is a leafier hillside established suburb with elevated outlooks. Mount Barker sits among greener hillside streets, while Littlehampton keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Littlehampton pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Mount Barker is the better pick for schools and education options and public transport access.

Littlehampton suits retirees and investors more clearly, whereas Mount Barker is the stronger match for families and households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons