Bugle Ranges vs Mount Barker, SA suburb comparison

Bugle Ranges for retirees; Mount Barker for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Bugle RangesMount Barker

Overall score

Bugle Ranges

41.4/100

Mount Barker

60.9/100

Crime rate

Bugle Ranges

6.2 / 1k

Mount Barker

29.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bugle Ranges

1

Mount Barker

250

Population

Bugle Ranges

289

Mount Barker

18,330

Metric leadBugle Ranges 3Mount Barker 5across 8 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBugle RangesMount Barker
Overall score41.4/10060.9/100
Housing (desirability)33.3/10047.6/100
Crime rate6.2 / 1k29.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools9
Public transport stops64
Walkability0.0/10080.0/100
Nearby amenities1250
Planning activity5453
Population28918,330
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/106/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Bugle Ranges is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks, and Mount Barker is a leafier hillside established suburb with elevated outlooks. Bugle Ranges sits within day-trip reach of the capital, whereas Mount Barker is in a middle-ring position.

Bugle Ranges pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook, whereas Mount Barker is the better pick for housing affordability and walkability. On housing, Bugle Ranges sits in a well priced band, compared with a expensive feel in Mount Barker.

Bugle Ranges suits retirees more clearly, whereas Mount Barker is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.

Related comparisons