Bugle Ranges vs Macclesfield, SA suburb comparison

Bugle Ranges for retirees and families; Macclesfield for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Bugle RangesMacclesfield

Overall score

Bugle Ranges

41.4/100

Macclesfield

38.8/100

Crime rate

Bugle Ranges

6.2 / 1k

Macclesfield

15.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bugle Ranges

1

Macclesfield

9

Population

Bugle Ranges

289

Macclesfield

1,413

Metric leadBugle Ranges 4Macclesfield 4across 8 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBugle RangesMacclesfield
Overall score41.4/10038.8/100
Housing (desirability)33.3/10073.3/100
Crime rate6.2 / 1k15.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools1
Public transport stops1
Walkability0.0/1005.5/100
Nearby amenities19
Planning activity528
Population2891,413
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/107/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Bugle Ranges is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks, and Macclesfield is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds. Bugle Ranges sits among greener hillside streets, while Macclesfield keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Bugle Ranges is stronger for a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook; Macclesfield answers with housing affordability and walkability. On housing, Bugle Ranges sits in a well priced band, compared with a expensive feel in Macclesfield.

Bugle Ranges suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Macclesfield is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.

Related comparisons