Bororen vs Tannum Sands, QLD Suburb Comparison

Bororen for retirees and families; Tannum Sands for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BororenTannum Sands

Overall score

Bororen

39.5/100

Tannum Sands

38.7/100

Crime rate

Bororen

71.2 / 1k

Tannum Sands

85.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bororen

12

Tannum Sands

11

Population

Bororen

399

Tannum Sands

5,227

Metric leadBororen 5Tannum Sands 6across 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBororenTannum Sands
Overall score39.5/10038.7/100
Housing (desirability)43.4/10049.9/100
Crime rate71.2 / 1k85.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools14
Weather (desirability)33.0/10011.8/100
Parks & reserves218
Walkability2.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities1211
Green cover0.0%1.3%
Population3995,227
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/105/10

Comparison summary

Bororen is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace, while Tannum Sands is a quieter mid-sized suburb with space and a country-town pace. Bororen sits further into the wider countryside, whereas Tannum Sands is more regionally self-contained.

On the data, Bororen is stronger for a quieter safety profile, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities; Tannum Sands answers with housing affordability, schools and education options, and parks and reserves. Bororen generally means more approachable housing costs, while Tannum Sands leans toward more sought-after housing.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Tannum Sands, while Bororen remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons