Overall score
Bridges
39.9/100
Yandina
57.8/100
Bridges vs Yandina, QLD Suburb Comparison
Bridges for schools; Yandina for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
BridgesYandina
Crime rate
Bridges
42.9 / 1k
Yandina
44.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Bridges
1
Yandina
129
Population
Bridges
295
Yandina
3,073
Metric leadBridges 1Yandina 62 tiedacross 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Bridges | Yandina |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 39.9/100 | 57.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 38.1/100 | 63.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 42.9 / 1k | 44.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 37.3/100 | 37.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 26 |
| Public transport stops | — | 10 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 60.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 1 | 129 |
| Planning activity | — | 1 |
| Green cover | 0.0% | 11.9% |
| Population | 295 | 3,073 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 4/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Bridges is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood, and Yandina is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Bridges sits among greener hillside streets, while Yandina keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Bridges is stronger for a quieter safety profile; Yandina answers with housing affordability, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities. On housing, Bridges sits in a well priced band, compared with a expensive feel in Yandina.
Retirees, families, and investors may find Bridges the better fit, while value-focused buyers and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Yandina.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.