Broadmeadows vs Campbellfield, VIC suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Broadmeadows | Campbellfield |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 57.8/100 | 63.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 54.1/100 | 81.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 308.9 / 1k | 313.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 9 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 12 | 9 |
| Public transport stops | 109 | 45 |
| Walkability | 83.0/100 | 90.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 392 | 170 |
| Planning activity | 227 | 143 |
| Population | 12,524 | 4,977 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 1/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesCampbellfield
- Best for familiesCampbellfield
- Best for investmentCampbellfield
- Best for best valueCampbellfield
Comparison summary
Broadmeadows is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Campbellfield is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Broadmeadows tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and schools and education options, while Campbellfield stands out for housing affordability and walkability.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Campbellfield, while Broadmeadows remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.