Broadmeadows vs Gladstone Park, VIC suburb comparison

Gladstone Park for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BroadmeadowsGladstone Park

Overall score

Broadmeadows

58.0/100

Gladstone Park

65.7/100

Crime rate

Broadmeadows

293.3 / 1k

Gladstone Park

63.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Broadmeadows

392

Gladstone Park

161

Population

Broadmeadows

12,524

Gladstone Park

8,213

Metric leadBroadmeadows 5Gladstone Park 6across 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBroadmeadowsGladstone Park
Overall score58.0/10065.7/100
Housing (desirability)54.1/10067.1/100
Crime rate293.3 / 1k63.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools159
Parks & reserves1213
Public transport stops10732
Walkability83.0/10082.0/100
Nearby amenities392161
Planning activity22725
Population12,5248,213
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/104/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Broadmeadows is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Gladstone Park is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.

On the data, Broadmeadows is stronger for schools and education options and public transport access; Gladstone Park answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. Broadmeadows generally means more approachable housing costs, while Gladstone Park leans toward more mid-market housing value.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Gladstone Park, while Broadmeadows remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons