Broadmeadows vs Gladstone Park, VIC suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Broadmeadows | Gladstone Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 57.8/100 | 65.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 54.1/100 | 67.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 308.9 / 1k | 62.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 9 | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | 12 | 13 |
| Public transport stops | 109 | 32 |
| Walkability | 83.0/100 | 82.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 392 | 161 |
| Planning activity | 227 | 25 |
| Population | 12,524 | 8,213 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 4/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesGladstone Park
- Best for familiesGladstone Park
- Best for investmentGladstone Park
- Best for best valueGladstone Park
- Best for best schoolsGladstone Park
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Broadmeadows is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Gladstone Park is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.
On the data, Broadmeadows is stronger for schools and education options and public transport access; Gladstone Park answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. Broadmeadows generally means more approachable housing costs, while Gladstone Park leans toward more mid-market housing value.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Gladstone Park, while Broadmeadows remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.