Overall score
Broadmeadows
58.0/100
Gladstone Park
65.7/100
Gladstone Park for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Broadmeadows
58.0/100
Gladstone Park
65.7/100
Crime rate
Broadmeadows
293.3 / 1k
Gladstone Park
63.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Broadmeadows
392
Gladstone Park
161
Population
Broadmeadows
12,524
Gladstone Park
8,213
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Broadmeadows | Gladstone Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 58.0/100 | 65.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 54.1/100 | 67.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 293.3 / 1k | 63.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 15 | 9 |
| Parks & reserves | 12 | 13 |
| Public transport stops | 107 | 32 |
| Walkability | 83.0/100 | 82.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 392 | 161 |
| Planning activity | 227 | 25 |
| Population | 12,524 | 8,213 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 4/10 |
Put side by side, Broadmeadows is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Gladstone Park is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.
On the data, Broadmeadows is stronger for schools and education options and public transport access; Gladstone Park answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. Broadmeadows generally means more approachable housing costs, while Gladstone Park leans toward more mid-market housing value.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Gladstone Park, while Broadmeadows remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.