Dallas vs Gladstone Park, VIC Suburb Comparison

Gladstone Park for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

DallasGladstone Park

Overall score

Dallas

33.2/100

Gladstone Park

47.1/100

Crime rate

Dallas

76.6 / 1k

Gladstone Park

72.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Dallas

123

Gladstone Park

165

Population

Dallas

6,762

Gladstone Park

8,213

Metric leadDallas 1Gladstone Park 111 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryDallasGladstone Park
Overall score33.2/10047.1/100
Housing (desirability)26.9/10063.3/100
Crime rate76.6 / 1k72.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools129
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves813
Public transport stops2032
Walkability59.0/10082.0/100
Nearby amenities123165
Planning activity7025
Green cover12.4%23.2%
Population6,7628,213
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/104/10

Comparison summary

Dallas reads as an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Gladstone Park is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.

On the data, Dallas is stronger for schools and education options; Gladstone Park answers with a quieter safety profile, parks and reserves, and public transport access. On housing, Dallas sits in a affordable band, compared with a gently premium feel in Gladstone Park.

On balance, retirees, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Gladstone Park, while Dallas remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons