Attwood vs Gladstone Park, VIC Suburb Comparison

Attwood for families; Gladstone Park for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

AttwoodGladstone Park

Overall score

Attwood

44.9/100

Gladstone Park

47.1/100

Crime rate

Attwood

53.9 / 1k

Gladstone Park

72.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Attwood

91

Gladstone Park

165

Population

Attwood

3,309

Gladstone Park

8,213

Metric leadAttwood 3Gladstone Park 91 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAttwoodGladstone Park
Overall score44.9/10047.1/100
Housing (desirability)50.6/10063.3/100
Crime rate53.9 / 1k72.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools39
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves513
Public transport stops532
Walkability7.5/10082.0/100
Nearby amenities91165
Planning activity1225
Green cover10.8%23.2%
Population3,3098,213
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/104/10

Comparison summary

Attwood is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Gladstone Park is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.

Attwood pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Gladstone Park is the better pick for housing affordability, schools and education options, and parks and reserves.

Choose Attwood if you are weighing retirees; lean toward Gladstone Park for families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons