Overall score
Attwood
48.7/100
Gladstone Park
65.7/100
Attwood for retirees; Gladstone Park for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Attwood
48.7/100
Gladstone Park
65.7/100
Crime rate
Attwood
37.1 / 1k
Gladstone Park
63.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Attwood
87
Gladstone Park
161
Population
Attwood
3,309
Gladstone Park
8,213
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Attwood | Gladstone Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 48.7/100 | 65.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 62.8/100 | 67.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 37.1 / 1k | 63.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 9 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | 13 |
| Public transport stops | 5 | 32 |
| Walkability | 7.5/100 | 82.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 87 | 161 |
| Planning activity | 12 | 25 |
| Population | 3,309 | 8,213 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 4/10 |
Attwood is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Gladstone Park is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.
Attwood pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook, whereas Gladstone Park is the better pick for housing affordability and schools and education options.
Choose Attwood if you are weighing retirees; lean toward Gladstone Park for investors and value-focused buyers.