Overall score
Bulgarra
18.7/100
Roebourne
15.6/100
Bulgarra vs Roebourne, WA suburb comparison
Bulgarra for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
BulgarraRoebourne
Crime rate
Bulgarra
1669.7 / 1k
Roebourne
5315.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Bulgarra
1
Roebourne
0
Population
Bulgarra
2,990
Roebourne
975
Metric leadBulgarra 7Roebourne 2across 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
Comparison summary
Bulgarra is a more rural mid-sized suburb that rewards people who want room to breathe, while Roebourne is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds.
On the data, Bulgarra is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Roebourne answers with public transport access and walkability. On housing, Bulgarra sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Roebourne.
Retirees may find Bulgarra the better fit, while households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Roebourne.