Overall score
Bulgarra
24.8/100
Roebourne
19.1/100
Bulgarra for families and value; Roebourne for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Bulgarra
24.8/100
Roebourne
19.1/100
Crime rate
Bulgarra
105.5 / 1k
Roebourne
105.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Bulgarra
18
Roebourne
9
Population
Bulgarra
2,990
Roebourne
975
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Bulgarra | Roebourne |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 24.8/100 | 19.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 29.4/100 | 9.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 105.5 / 1k | 105.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 0.2/100 | 0.2/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | — |
| Public transport stops | 1 | 4 |
| Walkability | 1.5/100 | 6.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 18 | 9 |
| Green cover | 1.0% | 0.4% |
| Population | 2,990 | 975 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 1/10 |
Bulgarra is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience, while Roebourne is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds.
On the data, Bulgarra is stronger for housing affordability, schools and education options, and nearby cafés and amenities; Roebourne answers with public transport access and walkability. On housing, Bulgarra sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Roebourne.
On balance, retirees, families, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Bulgarra, while Roebourne remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.