Bungalow vs Cairns City, QLD Suburb Comparison

Bungalow for investment and value; Cairns City for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BungalowCairns City

Overall score

Bungalow

37.6/100

Cairns City

52.4/100

Crime rate

Bungalow

237.2 / 1k

Cairns City

236.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bungalow

97

Cairns City

810

Population

Bungalow

2,358

Cairns City

3,616

Metric leadBungalow 2Cairns City 81 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBungalowCairns City
Overall score37.6/10052.4/100
Housing (desirability)64.2/10010.9/100
Crime rate237.2 / 1k236.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools76
Weather (desirability)11.8/10011.8/100
Parks & reserves15
Walkability24.0/10094.0/100
Nearby amenities97810
Green cover1.9%5.3%
Population2,3583,616
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/108/10

Comparison summary

Bungalow reads as a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace; Cairns City is a beachside mid-sized suburb where the coast sets the tone. Where Cairns City is shaped by the coast, Bungalow offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.

Bungalow tends to lead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options, while Cairns City stands out for parks and reserves, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities. Bungalow generally means more approachable housing costs, while Cairns City leans toward housing toward the upper end of the market.

Bungalow suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Cairns City is the stronger match for retirees, families, people chasing a beach lifestyle, and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons