Overall score
Burnie
56.7/100
Ulverstone
50.3/100
Burnie for retirees and families; Ulverstone for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Burnie
56.7/100
Ulverstone
50.3/100
Crime rate
Burnie
3422.6 / 1k
Ulverstone
156.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Burnie
587
Ulverstone
11
Population
Burnie
693
Ulverstone
6,653
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Burnie | Ulverstone |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 56.7/100 | 50.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 19.0/100 | 79.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 3422.6 / 1k | 156.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 5 |
| Public transport stops | 9 | 11 |
| Walkability | 83.5/100 | 18.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 587 | 11 |
| Population | 693 | 6,653 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 3/10 | 2/10 |
Burnie is a regional smaller community that feels self-contained without feeling remote, while Ulverstone is a slower-paced mid-sized suburb with open surrounds.
On the data, Burnie is stronger for walkability and nearby cafés and amenities; Ulverstone answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
Retirees and families may find Burnie the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Ulverstone.