Burnside Heights vs Ravenhall, VIC Suburb Comparison

Burnside Heights for retirees and families; Ravenhall for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Burnside HeightsRavenhall

Overall score

Burnside Heights

44.4/100

Ravenhall

23.2/100

Crime rate

Burnside Heights

24.8 / 1k

Ravenhall

332.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Burnside Heights

41

Ravenhall

74

Population

Burnside Heights

6,377

Ravenhall

2,295

Metric leadBurnside Heights 9Ravenhall 11 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBurnside HeightsRavenhall
Overall score44.4/10023.2/100
Housing (desirability)38.4/1000.6/100
Crime rate24.8 / 1k332.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools10—
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves21
Public transport stops1410
Walkability21.0/10017.0/100
Nearby amenities4174
Planning activity4112
Green cover23.9%0.3%
Population6,3772,295
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/10—

Comparison summary

Burnside Heights is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace, while Ravenhall is a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby. Burnside Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Ravenhall keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Burnside Heights tends to lead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves, while Ravenhall stands out for nearby cafés and amenities. On housing, Burnside Heights sits in a gently premium band, compared with a well priced feel in Ravenhall.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Burnside Heights, while Ravenhall remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons