Overall score
Burnside
49.3/100
Kensington Gardens
48.4/100
Burnside for retirees and families; Kensington Gardens for investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Burnside
49.3/100
Kensington Gardens
48.4/100
Crime rate
Burnside
11.1 / 1k
Kensington Gardens
22.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Burnside
70
Kensington Gardens
130
Population
Burnside
3,060
Kensington Gardens
2,498
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Burnside | Kensington Gardens |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 49.3/100 | 48.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 21.8/100 | 13.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 11.1 / 1k | 22.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 18 | 13 |
| Walkability | 35.0/100 | 65.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 70 | 130 |
| Planning activity | 31 | 34 |
| Population | 3,060 | 2,498 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Put side by side, Burnside is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Kensington Gardens is an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap.
Burnside pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Kensington Gardens is the better pick for walkability and nearby cafés and amenities.
Choose Burnside if you are weighing retirees and families; lean toward Kensington Gardens for investors.