Burnside vs Kensington Gardens, SA suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Burnside | Kensington Gardens |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 44.3/100 | 44.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 21.8/100 | 13.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 21.2 / 1k | 21.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 18 | 13 |
| Walkability | 35.0/100 | 65.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 70 | 130 |
| Planning activity | 28 | 28 |
| Population | 3,060 | 2,498 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesBurnside
- Best for familiesBurnside
- Best for investmentKensington Gardens
- Best for best valueBurnside
- Best for best schoolsBurnside
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Burnside is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Kensington Gardens is an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap.
Burnside pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Kensington Gardens is the better pick for walkability and nearby cafés and amenities.
Choose Burnside if you are weighing retirees and families; lean toward Kensington Gardens for investors.