Overall score
Hazelwood Park
54.7/100
Kensington Gardens
48.4/100
Hazelwood Park for retirees and families; Kensington Gardens for investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Hazelwood Park
54.7/100
Kensington Gardens
48.4/100
Crime rate
Hazelwood Park
14.9 / 1k
Kensington Gardens
22.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Hazelwood Park
85
Kensington Gardens
130
Population
Hazelwood Park
1,953
Kensington Gardens
2,498
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Hazelwood Park | Kensington Gardens |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 54.7/100 | 48.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 29.3/100 | 13.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 14.9 / 1k | 22.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 13 | 13 |
| Walkability | 42.5/100 | 65.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 85 | 130 |
| Planning activity | 18 | 34 |
| Population | 1,953 | 2,498 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Hazelwood Park reads as an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap; Kensington Gardens is an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap.
Hazelwood Park tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Kensington Gardens stands out for walkability and nearby cafés and amenities.
Hazelwood Park suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Kensington Gardens is the stronger match for investors.