Overall score
Hazelwood Park
64.6/100
Kensington Park
62.5/100
Hazelwood Park for families and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Hazelwood Park
64.6/100
Kensington Park
62.5/100
Crime rate
Hazelwood Park
14.9 / 1k
Kensington Park
24.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Hazelwood Park
85
Kensington Park
130
Population
Hazelwood Park
1,953
Kensington Park
2,627
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Hazelwood Park | Kensington Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 64.6/100 | 62.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 57.5/100 | 54.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 14.9 / 1k | 24.2 / 1k |
| Weather (desirability) | 37.3/100 | 37.3/100 |
| Public transport stops | 13 | 14 |
| Walkability | 42.5/100 | 71.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 85 | 130 |
| Planning activity | 22 | 42 |
| Green cover | 15.1% | 4.9% |
| Population | 1,953 | 2,627 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Hazelwood Park is an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap, while Kensington Park is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
On the data, Hazelwood Park is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and tree cover and green space; Kensington Park answers with public transport access, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities.
On balance, retirees, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Hazelwood Park, while Kensington Park remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.