Overall score
Glen Osmond
49.3/100
Hazelwood Park
57.0/100
Glen Osmond for investment; Hazelwood Park for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Glen Osmond
49.3/100
Hazelwood Park
57.0/100
Crime rate
Glen Osmond
61.6 / 1k
Hazelwood Park
15.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Glen Osmond
107
Hazelwood Park
85
Population
Glen Osmond
2,154
Hazelwood Park
1,953
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Glen Osmond | Hazelwood Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 49.3/100 | 57.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 30.4/100 | 29.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 61.6 / 1k | 15.4 / 1k |
| Public transport stops | 11 | 13 |
| Walkability | 24.5/100 | 42.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 107 | 85 |
| Planning activity | 21 | 18 |
| Population | 2,154 | 1,953 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Glen Osmond is a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby, while Hazelwood Park is an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap.
Glen Osmond pulls ahead on housing affordability and nearby cafés and amenities, whereas Hazelwood Park is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and public transport access.
Investors may find Glen Osmond the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Hazelwood Park.