Overall score
Frewville
46.6/100
Glen Osmond
49.3/100
Glen Osmond for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Frewville
46.6/100
Glen Osmond
49.3/100
Crime rate
Frewville
78.0 / 1k
Glen Osmond
61.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Frewville
58
Glen Osmond
107
Population
Frewville
896
Glen Osmond
2,154
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Frewville | Glen Osmond |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 46.6/100 | 49.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 17.9/100 | 30.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 78.0 / 1k | 61.6 / 1k |
| Public transport stops | 3 | 11 |
| Walkability | 56.5/100 | 24.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 58 | 107 |
| Planning activity | 8 | 21 |
| Population | 896 | 2,154 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 10/10 |
Frewville reads as an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap; Glen Osmond is a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby.
Frewville tends to lead on walkability and a calmer planning outlook, while Glen Osmond stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
On balance, retirees and investors are more likely to prefer Glen Osmond, while Frewville remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.