Overall score
Frewville
52.8/100
Glen Osmond
50.5/100
Frewville for investment; Glen Osmond for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Frewville
52.8/100
Glen Osmond
50.5/100
Crime rate
Frewville
52.4 / 1k
Glen Osmond
47.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Frewville
58
Glen Osmond
108
Population
Frewville
896
Glen Osmond
2,154
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Frewville | Glen Osmond |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 52.8/100 | 50.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 47.0/100 | 35.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 52.4 / 1k | 47.6 / 1k |
| Weather (desirability) | 37.3/100 | 37.3/100 |
| Public transport stops | 3 | 11 |
| Walkability | 56.5/100 | 24.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 58 | 108 |
| Planning activity | 10 | 29 |
| Green cover | 0.0% | 0.3% |
| Population | 896 | 2,154 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 10/10 |
Frewville reads as an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap; Glen Osmond is a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby.
Frewville tends to lead on walkability, overall desirability, and a calmer planning outlook, while Glen Osmond stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and public transport access.
Frewville suits families more clearly, whereas Glen Osmond is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.