Frewville vs Glen Osmond, SA Suburb Comparison

Frewville for investment; Glen Osmond for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

FrewvilleGlen Osmond

Overall score

Frewville

52.8/100

Glen Osmond

50.5/100

Crime rate

Frewville

52.4 / 1k

Glen Osmond

47.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Frewville

58

Glen Osmond

108

Population

Frewville

896

Glen Osmond

2,154

Metric leadFrewville 4Glen Osmond 61 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryFrewvilleGlen Osmond
Overall score52.8/10050.5/100
Housing (desirability)47.0/10035.1/100
Crime rate52.4 / 1k47.6 / 1k
Weather (desirability)37.3/10037.3/100
Public transport stops311
Walkability56.5/10024.5/100
Nearby amenities58108
Planning activity1029
Green cover0.0%0.3%
Population8962,154
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/1010/10

Comparison summary

Frewville reads as an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap; Glen Osmond is a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby.

Frewville tends to lead on walkability, overall desirability, and a calmer planning outlook, while Glen Osmond stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and public transport access.

Frewville suits families more clearly, whereas Glen Osmond is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons