Overall score
Glen Osmond
49.3/100
Tusmore
41.1/100
Glen Osmond for families and investment; Tusmore for retirees.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Glen Osmond
49.3/100
Tusmore
41.1/100
Crime rate
Glen Osmond
61.6 / 1k
Tusmore
22.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Glen Osmond
107
Tusmore
100
Population
Glen Osmond
2,154
Tusmore
1,503
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Glen Osmond | Tusmore |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 49.3/100 | 41.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 30.4/100 | 17.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 61.6 / 1k | 22.4 / 1k |
| Public transport stops | 11 | 14 |
| Walkability | 24.5/100 | 31.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 107 | 100 |
| Planning activity | 21 | 17 |
| Population | 2,154 | 1,503 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Put side by side, Glen Osmond is a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby, and Tusmore is an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap.
Glen Osmond tends to lead on housing affordability and nearby cafés and amenities, while Tusmore stands out for a quieter safety profile and public transport access.
Families and investors may find Glen Osmond the better fit, while retirees are more likely to prefer Tusmore.