Overall score
Tusmore
53.0/100
Wattle Park
59.7/100
Tusmore vs Wattle Park, SA Suburb Comparison
Tusmore for retirees and schools; Wattle Park for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
TusmoreWattle Park
Crime rate
Tusmore
26.2 / 1k
Wattle Park
15.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Tusmore
100
Wattle Park
123
Population
Tusmore
1,503
Wattle Park
1,885
Metric leadTusmore 1Wattle Park 82 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesTusmore
- Best for familiesWattle Park
- Best for investmentWattle Park
- Best for best valueWattle Park
- Best for best schoolsTusmore
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Tusmore | Wattle Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 53.0/100 | 59.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 46.0/100 | 47.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 26.2 / 1k | 15.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 37.3/100 | 37.3/100 |
| Public transport stops | 14 | 9 |
| Walkability | 31.0/100 | 59.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 100 | 123 |
| Planning activity | 22 | 18 |
| Green cover | 3.6% | 8.1% |
| Population | 1,503 | 1,885 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Tusmore reads as an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap; Wattle Park is a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby.
Tusmore tends to lead on public transport access, while Wattle Park stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and walkability.
Retirees, families, and households prioritising schools may find Tusmore the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Wattle Park.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.