Overall score
Leabrook
66.3/100
Wattle Park
59.7/100
Leabrook vs Wattle Park, SA Suburb Comparison
Leabrook for schools; Wattle Park for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
LeabrookWattle Park
Crime rate
Leabrook
18.0 / 1k
Wattle Park
15.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Leabrook
61
Wattle Park
123
Population
Leabrook
1,605
Wattle Park
1,885
Metric leadLeabrook 5Wattle Park 42 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesWattle Park
- Best for familiesWattle Park
- Best for best valueWattle Park
- Best for best schoolsLeabrook
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Leabrook | Wattle Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 66.3/100 | 59.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 55.5/100 | 47.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 18.0 / 1k | 15.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 37.3/100 | 37.3/100 |
| Public transport stops | 13 | 9 |
| Walkability | 69.5/100 | 59.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 61 | 123 |
| Planning activity | 9 | 18 |
| Green cover | 1.5% | 8.1% |
| Population | 1,605 | 1,885 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Leabrook reads as a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby; Wattle Park is a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby.
Leabrook tends to lead on public transport access, walkability, and overall desirability, while Wattle Park stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and nearby cafés and amenities.
Retirees, families, and households prioritising schools may find Leabrook the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Wattle Park.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.