Burnside vs Mount Osmond, SA suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Burnside | Mount Osmond |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 44.3/100 | 37.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 21.8/100 | 44.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 21.2 / 1k | 15.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Public transport stops | 18 | 1 |
| Walkability | 35.0/100 | 3.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 70 | 14 |
| Planning activity | 28 | 8 |
| Population | 3,060 | 464 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for familiesMount Osmond
- Best for investmentMount Osmond
- Best for best valueMount Osmond
- Best for best schoolsBurnside
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Burnside is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Mount Osmond is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks. Mount Osmond sits among greener hillside streets, while Burnside keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Burnside pulls ahead on public transport access and walkability, whereas Mount Osmond is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
Households prioritising schools may find Burnside the better fit, while families and investors are more likely to prefer Mount Osmond.