Overall score
Burnside
55.3/100
Norwood
53.1/100
Burnside for families and investment; Norwood for retirees.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Burnside
55.3/100
Norwood
53.1/100
Crime rate
Burnside
11.1 / 1k
Norwood
63.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Burnside
71
Norwood
685
Population
Burnside
3,060
Norwood
6,354
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Burnside | Norwood |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 55.3/100 | 53.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 47.5/100 | 52.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 11.1 / 1k | 63.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 37.3/100 | 37.3/100 |
| Public transport stops | 18 | 29 |
| Walkability | 35.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 71 | 685 |
| Planning activity | 35 | 119 |
| Green cover | 1.1% | 1.3% |
| Population | 3,060 | 6,354 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Burnside reads as a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby; Norwood is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.
On the data, Burnside is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook; Norwood answers with public transport access, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities.
On balance, retirees, families, investors, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Burnside, while Norwood remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.