Burnside vs Norwood, SA Suburb Comparison

Burnside for families and investment; Norwood for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BurnsideNorwood

Overall score

Burnside

55.3/100

Norwood

53.1/100

Crime rate

Burnside

11.1 / 1k

Norwood

63.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Burnside

71

Norwood

685

Population

Burnside

3,060

Norwood

6,354

Metric leadBurnside 3Norwood 63 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBurnsideNorwood
Overall score55.3/10053.1/100
Housing (desirability)47.5/10052.5/100
Crime rate11.1 / 1k63.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools11
Weather (desirability)37.3/10037.3/100
Public transport stops1829
Walkability35.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities71685
Planning activity35119
Green cover1.1%1.3%
Population3,0606,354
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Burnside reads as a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby; Norwood is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.

On the data, Burnside is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook; Norwood answers with public transport access, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Burnside, while Norwood remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons