Burua vs Calliope, QLD suburb comparison

Burua for retirees and investment; Calliope for families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BuruaCalliope

Overall score

Burua

39.9/100

Calliope

40.0/100

Crime rate

Burua

54.0 / 1k

Calliope

54.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Burua

0

Calliope

0

Population

Burua

849

Calliope

5,263

Metric leadBurua 3Calliope 32 tiedacross 8 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBuruaCalliope
Overall score39.9/10040.0/100
Housing (desirability)91.7/10071.4/100
Crime rate54.0 / 1k54.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools12
Parks & reserves7
Walkability0.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities00
Population8495,263
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/102/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Burua is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds, and Calliope is a more rural mid-sized suburb that rewards people who want room to breathe.

On the data, Burua is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Calliope answers with schools and education options and a larger local community. Burua generally means more mid-market housing value, while Calliope leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Retirees and investors may find Burua the better fit, while families are more likely to prefer Calliope.

Related comparisons