Overall score
Calliope
40.0/100
Wurdong Heights
34.8/100
Calliope for families and schools; Wurdong Heights for investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Calliope
40.0/100
Wurdong Heights
34.8/100
Crime rate
Calliope
54.3 / 1k
Wurdong Heights
54.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Calliope
0
Wurdong Heights
0
Population
Calliope
5,263
Wurdong Heights
465
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Calliope | Wurdong Heights |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 40.0/100 | 34.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 71.4/100 | 78.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 54.3 / 1k | 54.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | — |
| Parks & reserves | 7 | 1 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 0 |
| Population | 5,263 | 465 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 6/10 |
Calliope is a more rural mid-sized suburb that rewards people who want room to breathe, while Wurdong Heights is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks. Wurdong Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Calliope keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Calliope is stronger for a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves; Wurdong Heights answers with housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage. On housing, Calliope sits in a affordable band, compared with a well priced feel in Wurdong Heights.
Calliope suits families and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Wurdong Heights is the stronger match for investors.