Busselton vs Geographe, WA Suburb Comparison

Busselton for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BusseltonGeographe

Overall score

Busselton

55.9/100

Geographe

35.7/100

Crime rate

Busselton

49.7 / 1k

Geographe

49.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Busselton

160

Geographe

22

Population

Busselton

1,838

Geographe

3,622

Metric leadBusselton 8Geographe 22 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBusseltonGeographe
Overall score55.9/10035.7/100
Housing (desirability)51.3/10049.6/100
Crime rate49.7 / 1k49.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools71
Weather (desirability)63.3/10063.3/100
Parks & reserves71
Public transport stops3424
Walkability100.0/10032.0/100
Nearby amenities16022
Green cover9.1%1.8%
Population1,8383,622
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/104/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Busselton is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience, and Geographe is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience.

Busselton pulls ahead on housing affordability, schools and education options, and parks and reserves, whereas Geographe is the better pick for a larger local community and stronger socioeconomic advantage.

Families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools may find Busselton the better fit, while retirees are more likely to prefer Geographe.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons